Religion in the 13 Colonies

Brattle St Church in Boston, MA. Sketched around 1830.

Since understandings of religion have evolved over time, we thought we’d clarify a few things about the ways in which it’s thought of or talked about in the Omegaverse series. Despite many modern people trying to make a 1=1 understanding of how beliefs then were equal to beliefs today, that’s really quite a reductive understanding of how various religions featured in the Revolutionary period.

Today, we would call most of the characters involved in these stories some flavor of Christian, even if some of them might be more deist than theist, or even agnostic or atheist. In the times in which the characters lived, though, religion was often a bit more of a communal or inherited thing than a personal belief, and the particular flavor would matter more.

(Which isn’t to say there weren’t other religions practiced in the colonies. The majority populations of the Americas at this time practiced indigenous religions. There was also a sizable Jewish population.)

See, today many Christians are just Christian, with the occasional amendment of whether one is Protestant, Catholic, or Orthodox. In the thirteen colonies, and indeed in the British Empire, this was of high importance. In fact, some of these denominations didn’t consider each other truly Christian at all.

Many of the colonies were founded by people fleeing religious persecution back in Europe, such as the Quakers in Pennsylvania and the Puritans in Massachusetts. Religious tolerance also highly varied depending on colony, and the different religious and thus cultural traditions among the colonies presented challenges in uniting under a common cause. (If you’d like to learn about where certain religions were more common in the colonies, Brittanica has a handy map here).

And, of course, no matter which denomination people would be part of, there were varying degrees of practice, which is also reflected in our characters; some are more devout like Josiah, and some are very apathetic or more deistic.

The most common denominations you’ll find referenced in these books are:

Congregationalist – basically Puritanism that had evolved. They were also known for having distinctly Biblical or virtuous names, which proved amusing to those outside these circles.

Anglican – as the official Church of England, it makes sense many colonists would be practicing Anglicans.

Lutheran – directly descended from the teachings of Martin Luther, father of the Protestant Reformation.

Quaker – a somewhat mystic Christian movement also referred to as the Society of Friends, and known for their pacifism and opposition to slavery.

Presbyterian – originated in Scotland and England during the English Civil War in the mid-1600s.

Baptist – this movement placed great emphasis on total immersion baptism, and like Quakers, Presbyterians, and Congregationalists, originated from English Dissenters.

Catholic – there had been a long history of Protestant/Catholic violence in Europe over the past centuries, and the conflicts simmered in the Americas as well. Catholics actually weren’t allowed into the British military until 1778!

There were also other emerging religious philosophies at the time. Deism is probably the most well-known one: it’s the idea that God is a watchmaker who set the world up to run like a watch, but doesn’t personally intervene. Unitarianism was also started to emerge, and unlike more traditional branches of Christianity, denied the trinity and sometimes the deity of Christ.

You’ll hear many people today claim either that the Founding Fathers were all deists, but they weren’t. You’ll also hear that many of them were evangelical Christians. This is also likewise not true, and many of the people held up as such were distinctly not; for example, John Adams, who is frequently cited as one, was actually more of a Unitarian.

What does it matter? Not a ton, but for our fictional series, we just wanted to note that today’s understandings of religion don’t directly correlate to the 18th century versions.

And sadly, in real life, we also see people trying to appropriate the Founding Fathers to make political points by equating their religious practices to present-day flavors, but while you can sometimes see a through line, it’s somewhat ahistorical to equate them. But we also don’t want to ignore the religious aspect, as it would have been a part of many peoples’ lives in this time period, and indeed was relevant to the politics of the era too… for example, the first Great Awakening occurred ~1730-40, which certainly had an impact on politics and views that went into the Revolution, for better and for worse! And the British Anglican culture differing from various religious practices in the colonies did create some culture shock moments, some of which were rather amusing and will be discussed later/appear in the books.

Responses to “Religion in the 13 Colonies”

  1. Defective_Avian

    Did the existence of secondary genders impact religion at all? Like are Omegas assigned all the rules targeted at women in the Bible (like submit to your husband)?

    1. Mercy Leroux

      Ooh I love this question! Yes, since a lot of that comes from the Gerco-Roman ideas about submission including in the bedroom, omegas are subject to alphas. But there’s more nuance here. Basically, the hierarchy is “male over female” then “alpha over beta over omega.” So It’s considered more acceptable for a male omega to push back on a male alpha than a woman on a man (yay sexism). Cases of a male omega and female alpha would be side-eyed precisely for disrupting this idea, but since the the Apostle Paul made a big thing of “man formed first,” I suspect he would have added that the male omega has authority even over a female alpha. (All those long lost passages of 1 Timothy!)

      1. Defective_Avian

        That’s very interesting! It also makes sense since on average men regardless of their second gender would still generally be physically stronger than women, which if I had to guess probably has a lot to do with why so many societies are patriarchal.

  2. False Narratives of the Boston Massacre – Mercy Leroux

    […] soldiers were also Irish was used against them in public, too, because of the assumption that the Irish were all Catholic. However, none of the soldiers were, as the British Army actually didn’t allow Catholics to […]

  3. maeglin

    it must not have been the easiest for jotthew to be anglicans in massachusetts during the war… religious nationalism must’ve reached a fever pitch by the time they arrived home i’m guessing

    1. Mercy Leroux

      Yeahhhh it wasn’t easy where they were! Ironically in the south they’d have had a much easier time. I suspect they’re fairly quiet about it to keep the peace. Though, interestingly, in the next few decades universalism became much more of a trend among congregationalists… so tolerance increased quite a bit!

Leave a Reply

WP Twitter Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com

Discover more from Mercy Leroux

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading