,

William Fanthorp and Corporal Cheene

Kicking off our historical context posts (and also leading in to the first of the extra scenes from We Are Not Strangers, which will be based on this incident and will be posted here on the blog on New Year’s Day!), we have:

One of the most amusing anecdotes to come out of pre-Revolutionary Boston and its dealings with British soldiers is the tale of William Fanthorp and Corporal Cheene, who appear as important (and are Mercy’s twin’s favorite) side characters in We Are Not Strangers.

Meme image of two cartoon figures wrestling over guns

About six months prior to Lexington and Concord, one William Fanthorp was confined by his captain for being drunk on duty. Then he tried to take his arms from Cheene, because alcohol + guns is always a great idea.

The resulting court martial sentenced him to 200 lashes, but the commanding officer refused to sign off on the punishment because it was too light. As Fanthorp couldn’t be tried again, he got off without a single lash. The whole brouhaha erupted when someone leaked the ordeal to the very anti-British Massachusetts Spy newspaper, decrying “tyrannical commanders.” 

As for said brouhaha, it got so widely reported that Hugh Percy, most likely the commander referenced, had to write home about it. Y’know, just in case his parents got wind of the scandal.

Printed letter from Earl Percy to his parents, reading "As as extraordinary publication has appeared in a newspaper of this town... I cannott help thinking it my duty to send you the particulars of that transaction.... one would really think that the spirit of the inhabitants had got amongst the officers"

The idea of the young officers getting infected with the rebellious spirit of the dastardly colonialists likely not only refers to the daily kerfuffles Percy references, but to the idea that one of their own had leaked this information to the press.

So, who did?

Tags:

Responses to “William Fanthorp and Corporal Cheene”

  1. defectiveavian

    If 200 lashes is considered lenient, I’d hate to see what would be considered excessive.😬

    1. Mercy Leroux

      They were allowed up to 1000 lashes in the British Army. Yeah. My understanding is that this was not given all at once, and a surgeon had to be present to make sure the poor person wasn’t in medical danger (relatively). It wasn’t uncommon for the number to be reduced, either, but still. (The Continental Army permitted significantly less; if I recall correctly, the maximum amount was less than 100).
      Also, there’s a couple records of women (from Boston 1775-1776, wife Isabella McMahon and sutler Winifred McCowen) sentenced to 100 lashes. While men were typically flogged in front of their regiment, both women were sentenced to be flogged at public places in town.
      Also, thank you so much for the comment! <3

      1. defectiveavian

        I’m glad that’s no longer a thing. Those poor soldiers!

Leave a Reply

WP Twitter Auto Publish Powered By : XYZScripts.com

Discover more from Mercy Leroux

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading